postcall.ai vs Granola
Two different approaches to meeting notes
Quick Comparison
| Granola | postcall.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| Bot joins calls | No | No |
| Platform | macOS, Windows, iOS | Web (any device) |
| Real-time notes | ||
| Follow-up emails | ||
| Role-based personas | ||
| Cross-meeting memory | ||
| Pricing | Free / $14 | Free / $10 |
Different Approaches
Granola: Real-Time Local Processing
Granola runs on your device and processes audio in real-time during the meeting. Great for taking notes while you listen, with AI enhancement. Available on macOS, Windows, and iOS.
postcall.ai: Post-Meeting Processing
We process recordings after the meeting ends. Works on any device (web-based), includes follow-up emails, role-based personas, and cross-meeting context. Better for professionals who want polished outputs and client communication tools.
When Granola Might Be Better
- You prefer native desktop/mobile apps over web
- You want to take notes during the meeting with AI assistance
- Real-time processing is more important than post-call analysis
When postcall.ai Is Better
- You prefer web-based access from any browser (no app install)
- You want built-in follow-up email generation (vs Zapier integration)
- You want a centralized task dashboard across all meetings
- You prefer post-meeting analysis over real-time note-taking
- You need Android or Linux support